From owner-freebsd-questions Sun May 24 14:44:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA17628 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sun, 24 May 1998 14:44:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from caladan.tdx.co.uk (caladan.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA17610 for ; Sun, 24 May 1998 14:44:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Received: from tdx.co.uk (lorca-tx.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.242]) by caladan.tdx.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA03328; Sun, 24 May 1998 22:44:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Message-ID: <356894A6.B5CE449C@tdx.co.uk> Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 22:44:06 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz Organization: TDX X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: amg CC: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Help References: <35689521.167EB0E7@cris.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG amg wrote: > > Questions: > > Does the FreeBSD SCO binary compatibility option allow one to > use a 3rd party library, that has been compiled for SCO UnixWare 2.1, > to be used when compiling binaries on a FreeBSD platform, > specifically, > 2.2.X?? Hi, I don't think so (though I may be wrong) - won't the SCO library be in a different format? - I don't know if you could pursuade FreeBSD's linking tools to link it... Regards, Karl Pielorz To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message