Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:42:54 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Derek Kulinski <takeda@takeda.tk> Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, FreeBSD <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Thomas Mueller <mueller23@insightbb.com>, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <50E4638E.2080204@mu.org> In-Reply-To: <145c92bb-a450-4078-9f82-6ed17123a3ad@email.android.com> References: <12.BF.00942.82514E05@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> <CADLo838bavOGsBeb22me9NQH-OFgj81YQhO2fCU13xe=XfNnGA@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgmvMfNaJo9TLQmvoC-R-XLM62AhpRf-aqB-NwtmPCTANw@mail.gmail.com> <145c92bb-a450-4078-9f82-6ed17123a3ad@email.android.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/2/13 8:05 AM, Derek Kulinski wrote: > Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: > >> On 2 January 2013 06:26, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: >>> To clarify, no-one wants to remove CVS completely, the suggestion was >> to >>> move it out of the base system. >> As the developer responsible for this: >> >> CVS will be removed from base. It already exists as a port in >> devel/cvs > Will svn be added to the base? Not long ago I run into an issue when trying to downgrade my system to 9.0. > > After I noticed how majority of ports were broken due to changes in the libc I decided to back out by fetching 9.1 release just to learn that svn does not work as well. There were a lot of dependencies I decided to use portupgrade which required me to recompile ruby. After that it was a lot of compiling (for example Apache because apr was broken). Having svn in the base would save tons of time in my situation. > Sorry, you needed to fetch 9.0 packages then*. Putting all of that in base is not likely to happen. * I wish doing this was somewhat more intuitive/easy -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50E4638E.2080204>