From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 08:27:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72B1106566B for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:27:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@vas.org.ua) Received: from relay.electro.ua (electro.ua [213.186.192.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616F58FC16 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.electro.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02235170B2; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:27:41 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at http.org.ua Received: from relay.electro.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (http.org.ua [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UdOl0EaX-wca; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:27:40 +0200 (EET) Received: from [172.20.254.180] (gw.umc.com.ua [80.255.64.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay.electro.ua (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B99F0170B0; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:27:40 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <4BAC6FF3.7090304@vas.org.ua> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:27:31 +0200 From: Vasily Samoylov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harti Brandt References: <4BAB5A77.7050505@mts.com.ua> <61b573981003250659n1076fef1u7d15920c4d560fdf@mail.gmail.com> <20100326080816.X46084@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <20100326080816.X46084@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Harti Brandt , Shteryana Shopova , Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:27:42 -0000 On 26.03.2010 9:10, Harti Brandt wrote: > SS>P.S. Back to the thread topic - so the only problem the author is > SS>facing with bsnmp is that it lacks support for LLDP, do I understand > SS>correctly? > > This is what I understood too. > > harti > I, probably, was to verbose, and didn't make myself clear enough. For now, from network admin point of view, it's 3 problems: 1) No ARP support 2) Routing table not exported correctly (directly attached routes not visible, maybe something else - at least it's nothing like netstat -rn gives) 3) No LLDP support