From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 31 03:45:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E12016A4CE for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 03:45:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from obh.snafu.de (obh.snafu.de [213.73.92.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A374C43D3F for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 03:45:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ob@gruft.de) Received: from ob by obh.snafu.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1AmtZM-00010n-00 for current@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:45:48 +0100 Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:45:48 +0100 From: Oliver Brandmueller To: current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040131114548.GA2632@e-Gitt.NET> References: <20040130115025.GB96881@e-Gitt.NET> <200401310143.51186.freebsd-current@webteckies.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401310143.51186.freebsd-current@webteckies.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: Oliver Brandmueller Subject: Re: max blockdevice/filesystem size? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:45:51 -0000 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi. On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:43:50AM +0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > > Since the information in the FAQ seems rather outdated, can someone tell > > me, what the maximum size of a UFS2/ffs filesystem is with FreeBSD 5.2? > > I'm looking for practical values. Something like: OK, we hit the max > > size of a SCSI device, so we use some more of them and vinum. How much > > TB would work in a single FS? >=20 > See this thread for detailed information: > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-current/2004-January/threa= d.html#19314 Well, I've seen that read earlier, but well it talks a lot about the=20 limits of UFS1 and FBSD 4 - which are by far too low. Plans here were=20 something about 10 TB as a first step. Due to the nature of data and how=20 they are accessed it's not really simple to split them up into different=20 filesystems, as it's not easy to predict which parts grow most. Well, would a 10 TB fs work out of the Box with 5.2? - Oliver --=20 | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! | --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAG5VsiqtMdzjafykRAqQrAJ45JC6+5pBGvUG68m5u+Sf96ogvygCgpTMC 7HmcACrzv51Ki6L4KkiJdKU= =fYzp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--