Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Sep 2000 18:36:33 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: sysctl MIB and kernel internals 
Message-ID:  <64485.969035793@critter>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 15 Sep 2000 12:26:56 EDT." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000915120346.45037J-100000@fledge.watson.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000915120346.45037J-100000@fledge.watson.org>, Robe
rt Watson writes:

>I'd like to see us consider moving to an alternative model, divorcing the
>implementation internals of various kernel objects (processes, et al) from
>the MIB interface retrieving management data about them.

Yes (please!)

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?64485.969035793>