Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:52:41 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Terrence Koeman <terrence@mediamonks.net> Cc: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Subject: Re: DNS - slaving the root zone Message-ID: <4F417D39.2010606@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <e56c0e659d234f4d919d9b89eed01bec@mediamonks.com> References: <e56c0e659d234f4d919d9b89eed01bec@mediamonks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/19/2012 10:39, Terrence Koeman wrote: > I'm just done converting from named.root to slaving the root, I > checked which servers allow axfr (at least for me...) and added them > all as masters. Given that some of the root server operators don't really like people doing this routinely it would be net.friendlier to list the ICANN servers first. They are just as up to date as the live root servers. > Multiple masters would substantially decrease the > risk of stale zones, yes? Yes. > Also, I was wondering, now that I slave . and arpa, is it still > beneficial to retain the 'empty zones' that fall within those or are > they redundant? They are not redundant, and yes, they are still beneficial. Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F417D39.2010606>