Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:11:28 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: deischen@freebsd.org Cc: alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libpthread support Message-ID: <20030809031128.GA60353@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10308082219340.7659-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <20030809003630.GA3293@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10308082219340.7659-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:21:32PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > Other than that I suggest we commit it, hook-up libkse to the build > > and cross bridges when we come to them (ie we tweak and/or fix when > > we can actually test the code). Thoughts? > > Sure, I'll try to commit it tomorrow. Feel free to beat > me to it if you want. Don't expect that to happen :-) > There were a few places in enter_uts.S and context.S where > I used ldil and ldl instructions. Those should be ldiq and > ldq's, right? Yes. Some may actually not break anything, but all fields are defined as long, so we should probably use ld?q in all cases. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030809031128.GA60353>