From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 23:37:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E221065670 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luizgustavo@luizgustavo.pro.br) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582688FC14 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so832277wwb.13 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:37:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.91.80 with SMTP id g58mr8718017wef.112.1277768229442; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:37:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.178.134 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:37:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:37:09 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Luiz Gustavo S. Costa" To: Gabriel Fonseca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rdr + reply-to, some solution ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:37:18 -0000 PERFECT !!!!! This is it ! (tribute to MJ) worked perfectly, had not really thought about using tag, perfect. thank you (valeu !) goodbye rinetd/redir ! 2010/6/28 Gabriel Fonseca : > 2010/6/28 Luiz Gustavo S. Costa >> >> hi Chris ! how are you? >> >> as it says here in Brazil: "I eat ball" :). >> >> pass in $if_int reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to >> 192.168.1.100 port 80 >> >> but still, the combination does not work >> >> thanks >> >> >> 2010/6/28 Chris Buechler : >> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa >> > wrote: >> >> Hi all. >> >> >> >> I know there is a problem in using rdr with the reply-to, I usually >> >> use some software to "rdr", as the rinetd, but it's not a pretty >> >> solution. >> >> >> >> Is there any alternative? >> >> >> >> Below is an example of what I'm talking about. >> >> >> >> # Nat section >> >> rdr on $if_ext2 proto tcp from any to 200.x.x.x port 80 -> >> >> 192.168.1.100 >> >> # Rules section >> >> pass in $if_ext2 reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to >> >> 200.x.x.x port 80 >> >> >> > >> > That rule won't match traffic from that rdr. The dest has to be the >> > 192.168.1.100 IP. >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) >> *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ >> mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre >> http://www.mundounix.com.br >> ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: contato@mundounix.com.br >> Tel: 55 (21) 2642-3799 / 7582-0594 >> Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Hi, Luiz "gugaBSD" Gustavo. > I don't exactly what your need, but I'll try help. > > Try this: > rdr on $if_ext2 proto tcp from any to 200.x.x.x port 80 tag LINK2 -> > 192.168.1.100 > pass in quick on $if_ext2 reply-to ( $if_ext2 $gw_ext2=A0 ) tagged LINK2 > > I hope that helps. > > Gabriel "ethX" Fonseca > > > > > --=20 Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: contato@mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 2642-3799 / 7582-0594 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br