From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 11 0:11:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from login-2.eunet.no (login-2.eunet.no [193.71.71.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0521158AA for ; Tue, 11 May 1999 00:11:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (mbendiks@login-1.eunet.no [193.71.71.238]) by login-2.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.0/GN) with ESMTP id JAA25539; Tue, 11 May 1999 09:11:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA08543; Tue, 11 May 1999 09:11:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 09:11:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: Lyndon.Nerenberg@MessagingDirect.COM Cc: cyouse@cybersites.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sockets and SYSTEM V message queue In-Reply-To: <199905102103.PAA13125@rembrandt.esys.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm not sure what kind of improvement you would get by using AF_LOCAL, but I've seen well in excess of 40 mbyte/sec throughput on a 66Mhz 486dx2, using the loopback interface. I believe you would need RAID to actually feed sensible data into the interface at this speed (assuming the disk is the source of this data). - Marius - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message