From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 27 16:18:50 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id QAA23977 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 16:18:50 -0800 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA23971 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 16:18:45 -0800 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA04179; Mon, 27 Feb 95 17:11:42 MST From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9502280011.AA04179@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD To: phk@ref.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 95 17:11:41 MST Cc: nate@trout.sri.MT.net, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199502272118.NAA26885@ref.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Feb 27, 95 01:18:11 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Would CTM'ing the library portion of the NetBSD tree be satisfactory? > > What would you expect this to do ? Keep the history that Nate is unhappy about losing even if FreeBSD is only an OEM of the library code and doesn't really need the history itself. Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.