From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 7 06:48:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5FC16A415 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 06:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE3B43D46 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 06:48:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id o37so934393nzf for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:48:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SjvXHhfPj9oy3VjxNFbnkiYZeLu6qAQcsFLDMUdkOynCYb3aG7Fj29p6xEp5CQy8yq6MQsg4ZmlI5clsLhoNqT+r8uwIY1LVf3KKP0NWylbCvemxkXcctTxKouiM1Getsx7lsmLOcOLvGO+ELhBRgSNkL/knfypnbMMn0WTbYhg= Received: by 10.35.95.1 with SMTP id x1mr2426044pyl.1162881739107; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:42:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.118.6 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 22:42:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0611062242h42b1bde6w711e9a5039ed1a90@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 22:42:18 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Adrian Chadd" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <68011C68-0962-4946-88E1-F36EE7C707DA@redstarling.com> <20061106221219.GA66676@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <041201c701f9$37b2aed0$9603a8c0@claylaptop> <2a41acea0611061614n478efe77y82c0ebc2e1b01e19@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em driver testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 06:48:59 -0000 On 11/6/06, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Just out of curiousity - why wasn't the offending MPSAFE related > changes to em just reverted after discovering the em instability? The > driver -was- stable a couple of months ago, no? Actually it was not. Some reports have cited problems back to 6.0 or before. The watchdog design was fundamentally flawed from an SMP point of view and needed to be changed. We also didnt want to go backwards if possible. My Intel driver had support for new hardware that was good to pick up. There's lots of new stuff coming too, so stay tuned :) Jack