Date: Wed, 1 Nov 1995 03:27:21 -0800 (PST) From: -Vince- <vince@apollo.COSC.GOV> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: julian@ref.tfs.com, jc@irbs.com, current@FreeBSD.org, FAQ@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1 update Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951101032606.15405Q-100000@apollo.COSC.GOV> In-Reply-To: <199511011012.LAA15613@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Nov 1995, Ollivier Robert wrote: > It seems that -Vince- said: > > > > So it is really ahead of stable or 2.1 in the code? > > -CURRENT is ahead of 2.1. 2.1 is "just" 2.0.5 with fixes. It has not the > latest VM rewrite, the latest PPP, and so on. > > At some point after 2.1, -CURRENT will probably become 2.3-CURRENT and > -STABLE will be 2.2-STABLE to end up with 2.2-RELEASE and so on. So what you are saying is that -release is really just -current at some point? and -stable is just really -current before a -release? Cheers, -Vince- vince@COSC.GOV - GUS Mailing Lists Admin UC Berkeley AstroPhysics - Electrical Engineering (Honorary B.S.) Chabot Observatory & Science Center - Board of Advisors Running FreeBSD - Real UN*X for Free! Linda Wong/Vivian Chow/Hacken Lee/Danny Chan Fan Club Mailiing Lists Admin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.951101032606.15405Q-100000>