Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:30:46 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: "David E. Thiel" <lx@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dead projects in ports tree Message-ID: <20090302233046.GB7269@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20090302223600.GD29616@redundancy.redundancy.org> References: <7d6fde3d0902281509v6a98521as618421daf52b3abe@mail.gmail.com> <7d6fde3d0902281605u2a251513q44ccfc0c8226c9fd@mail.gmail.com> <20090302223600.GD29616@redundancy.redundancy.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:35:38PM -0801, David E. Thiel wrote: > I would like to hear what people feel the best method for getting rid > of unused and irrelevant ports, though -- bump portrevision and mark > BROKEN for a few months? How about marking them DEPRECATED and with an EXPIRATION_DATE, as is already commonly done? mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090302233046.GB7269>