Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 23:06:50 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: Mike Squires <mikes@ct980320-b.blmngtn1.in.home.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.4-RC + samba faster than NT 4 Server Message-ID: <20010825230649.H66784@leviathan.inethouston.net> In-Reply-To: <200108260404.f7Q44bT85074@ct980320-b.blmngtn1.in.home.com> References: <200108260404.f7Q44bT85074@ct980320-b.blmngtn1.in.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 11:04:36PM -0500, Mike Squires wrote: > I just performed a crude benchmark for large file transfers using the old > Netware "TESTNET.EXE" DOS benchmark program. The 4.4-RC system is a SM P6DLH > with a single PII/300 with 128MB, DPT controller, 4xST410800WD drives; the NT > 4 server is also a P6DLH, dual PII/300, 256MB, 2 Adaptec 2944UW with 8 > ST410800WD; both use Intel Pro100 cards. > > Samba is 2.0.9_1. > > Network is a 3Com 3000 12-port 10/100 switch. > > Client is a SM P6DGH with a single PII/300, ST15050W, 256MB, also using > an Intel Pro100; client is running MS Windows 2000 Pro SP2. TESTNET was > run in a DOS (CMD) box. > > TESTNET was run with 5000 65535 byte records, total of 328MB. The 4.4-RC > box clocked at 3.2MB/sec; the NT 4 server clocked at 2.8MB/sec. The > ST410800WD's are not good for much more than 5MB/sec sustained, but what > do you expect for $10 each? > > I also got respectable speeds using mars_nwe on the 4.4-RC box. > > Thanks. > > MLS > (who likes SM's old AT-form factor dual PII/III motherboards) Use 2.2.1a, they added a workaround to a windows bug that had a lot of performance problems. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net> dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010825230649.H66784>