From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jun 15  7:12:19 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ideaglobal.com (ultra2.ideaglobal.com [194.36.20.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1153A14EFC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 07:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kiril@ideaglobal.com)
Received: (from kiril@localhost)
	by ideaglobal.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id PAA20613
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 15:07:08 +0100 (BST)
From: Kiril Mitev <kiril@ideaglobal.com>
Message-Id: <199906151407.PAA20613@ideaglobal.com>
Subject: Re: Linux not FreeBSD? (fwd)
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 15:07:08 +0100 (BST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Forwarded message:
> 
> On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Greg Quinlan wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > This might give people a little bit of a laugh (not really for this forum):
> > 
> > Here is SCO (the Serious Commercial Organisation of the free software
> > rip-offs merchants) Saying they are adding Linux compatibility.... well,
> > well... could not be bothered doing their own thing anymore with free
> > software source and decided to do some alignment with free software
> > developers, and OS's so it wil make their product more attractive
> > 
> > But why Linux and not FreeBSD also?
> Because FreeBSD dous not have the volume of users Linux apparently has.

s/users/programs/

<sigh>

> Now to be serious it does not realy matter because Linux Binaries run
> under FreeBSD so the apps from SCO should run on FreeBSD anyway.
> 
> Michael
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 

Kiril


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message