From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 21:52:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5643216A402 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 21:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gustavodn@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178AA13C461 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 21:52:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gustavodn@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 55so2021339wri for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 13:52:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XDGW7zk+zKOKccfux1PehPZR6K9ei21QTkTkvHEXBlKza0wsnS3uHqykzddVtIrWTyFI/z0W8bOlierCIu9m81dshp/1LeemJxtHH0Oo+tgrxkBIAgCJsFAp5dEvb2kgNnA57TwoiJs+juFzYgB5m24ZcmbKvhekIEf3z9PgSvM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=C3wzepEAb68MHiXvllJWjfsPUIFzL5qdZDfLmIz1DNmQhYwmDFipldUJcXSFWRnr4H8/1HfyKhqVVvvorSK4FAd1JpiMXNiEo6bylFqEz3uGEc2XERLn/xTzK9Z/GNi8Ep43e6lK7cy0L4NceLHyzdeO2kWD7tNwqCalNx8lyPw= Received: by 10.114.170.1 with SMTP id s1mr1024345wae.1173043586194; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 13:26:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.190.14 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:26:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50af0a260703041326s5a887c3dhcd0816e7c59a5297@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:26:26 -0300 From: "Gustavo De Nardin" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: gconcat on existing filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:52:29 -0000 Hello. Is it expected that 'gconcat create ...' on an existing device with populated filesystem keeps all existing data? That is, is it expected behavior that something like 'umount /dev/ad0s3', 'gconcat create data /dev/ad0s3', 'mount /dev/concat/data /mnt' works, or is it just luck? -- (nil)