From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar  7 05:00:36 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED02D106574F;
	Wed,  7 Mar 2012 05:00:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bogorodskiy@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7848FC0C;
	Wed,  7 Mar 2012 05:00:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so6538989bkc.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:00:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=7X53VRSDs0fdeDw0W8pffpToSv7kP3vuZphHR0anrr0=;
	b=PcDQSvKu0FqvkJEpYDTttPChbY3rYd9L78ukyLQ6noMYxq54H60vwYFKxmbF+1DJdw
	OauPO8K6ACl2IGAIb/cpy0Jl1lG6PQwAbUcMCvpLHWhRNsPGXvDQNWa6PWOKu7X4VWE2
	gt9SIU5QAkmlxJgk3eBpBVsPcVAAsPSXAFRZ0yYvTh93Vi7spcxize81JXAn403StnHp
	udzgsUMTCvo7By1l9VOC+iVIkmTwFB8l94HfNX6lnQ9rs3n6PiQ/UEYX1qHD4rMNi08o
	akyQOxD1Z2rH27rcMVDPa8TbvzYiELDNaRu694jT7xI1T0NtZ9XBkjvZkxV3vhxpfEB6
	vM1Q==
Received: by 10.204.136.206 with SMTP id s14mr264782bkt.70.1331096421088;
	Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:00:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fsol ([95.104.135.210])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t17sm36023755bke.6.2012.03.06.21.00.18
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:00:06 +0400
From: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org>
To: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20120307050004.GA2988@fsol>
References: <20120304121947.GC1250@kloomba>
 <4F54826C.7070701@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F54826C.7070701@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libtool question again
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 05:00:37 -0000

  Alex Dupre wrote:

> Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > I'm planning to update security/gnutls from 2.12.16 to 2.12.17. A new
> > interface has been added and the shared library version was updated
> > accordingly: current was incremented and revision set to 0, just like
> > the libtool documentation suggests:
> 
> And 'age' ? If only a new interface has been added, age should be
> incremented too, and so the shared library bump is not needed. If so,
> you can use:

The age was incremented.

> USE_AUTOTOOLS=	libtool
> USE_GNOME=	ltverhack
> 
> to avoid bumping.

I'm using it and it doesn't help: libgnutls.so.47 becomes
libgnutls.so.48 (where 48 is 'current').

Roman Bogorodskiy