From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:20:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 982CF141 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com (mail-ig0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 581ED1699 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id l13so10078938iga.3 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:20:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rGavw66ZLf4whg4zgr0g7VatdvaVoZYPkq29CDob6lk=; b=HPdRvunWXDbpjVlttHkqenYgoNnKNdfKIvD5jIcJ9wbLUZ4DbZkZhOLOr/J4Xo/Uif 2ld47IRjxGAEp1S5C2m6mwD+YY7pPhHOoTrVyby3jdDLCsfP5Iq4Wr78e66lnSE9BKO5 1dIVlEEZQwbtZOqxGgQTtnZgwUwOkAtCTgpvMfD/+VkW1pCU0V4vNt3eABeac9KcnrxN PB5b+dxGCteTLRzPENSzXZjnmYPEmdd16f2GX3/r1OosaGDZVTY6u1fqV6d8ZHUjccB6 lFc044tX3yh4wPuClMTgRSA6PZY1gqq1bLsN2cX7o/6zgxytDYME91YBXJ9gnidg8DWj CGvw== X-Received: by 10.50.29.107 with SMTP id j11mr10079688igh.32.1418847650811; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:20:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2601:7:6c80:6f00::a767]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bd5sm8299008igb.14.2014.12.17.12.20.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:20:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:20:48 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:20:51 -0000 On 12/17/2014 01:15 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block > size. > Expect reduced performance. The status report does not identify the offending drive, so if you remove the drive (instead of replacing it), do you still get the same status report?