From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 23 19:32:29 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328AE16A41C;
	Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:32:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4C743D53;
	Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:32:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4540060FA;
	Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:32:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101E160F7;
	Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:32:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 8D29133D39; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:32:22 +0200 (CEST)
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References: <42BAC058.3040603@squbes.com> <42BAC1CB.30402@samsco.org>
	<86mzphcc0z.fsf@xps.des.no> <200506231337.27239.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:32:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <200506231337.27239.jhb@FreeBSD.org> (John Baldwin's message of
	"Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:37:25 -0400")
Message-ID: <86zmtglvi1.fsf@xps.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Learn: ham
X-Spam-Score: -5.2/5.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on tim.des.no
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>,
	Gregg Cooper <bsdcrank@squbes.com>
Subject: Re: Duplicate inodes in 5.4-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:32:29 -0000

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Even if mkisofs is patched this change isn't a bug in mkisofs.  It's
> really a bug in our iso9660 filesystem. :(

Yes, but it's a lot harder to fix there than in mkisofs :)

Actually, -CURRENT doesn't have this bug, but it has another: it bases
the inode number on the position of the directory entry, so hard links
are lost.  It doesn't make a big difference, because mkisofs seems
unable to generate ISO 9660 file systems with hard links.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no