From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 25 19:07:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B63F016A4CE; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 19:07:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 25E4643D69; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 19:07:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5PJ3uoY021318;
	Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:03:57 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:04:08 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20040625.130408.122318525.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: liamfoy@sepulcrum.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040625173503.3f8c2b0c.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org>
References: <20040625162945.5f67d584.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org>
	<xzppt7nzjjd.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040625173503.3f8c2b0c.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
cc: tinderbox@freebsd.org
cc: des@des.no
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: i386@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 19:07:57 -0000

In message: <20040625173503.3f8c2b0c.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org>
            "Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> writes:
: On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:31:18 +0200
: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote:
: =

: > "Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> writes:
: > > I think this should solve the problem, correct me if am wrong. =3D=
)
: > =

: > No, that just shoves it under the carpet.
: Maybe you could explain why ?

Because it just initializes the variable without understanding WHY it
is uninitialized, or what the right default value might be.

Warner