From owner-freebsd-security  Fri Jun  2 08:15:09 1995
Return-Path: security-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA10708
          for security-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 08:15:09 -0700
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA10696
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 08:15:07 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA03294; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 08:14:15 -0700
Message-Id: <199506021514.IAA03294@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
cc: FREEBSD-SECURITY-L <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: xinetd 2.1.4 for FreeBSD 2.x (fwd) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 Jun 1995 15:42:59 +0800."
             <Pine.BSI.3.91.950602154128.314H-100000@leo> 
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 1995 08:14:15 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@Shockwave.COM>
Sender: security-owner@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

I've looked at xinetd's source code before.  I'd never condone it being made
part of the base system,  but it'd be fine as a port.