From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 15 17:07:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA00912 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Fri, 15 May 1998 17:07:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA00888 for ; Fri, 15 May 1998 17:07:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA02973; Fri, 15 May 1998 17:06:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 17:06:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Charlie Root cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW In-Reply-To: <199805140217.VAA01596@ftp1.mfn.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 13 May 1998, Charlie Root wrote: > Is this a legal construct? > > ipfw add allow all tcp from 10.0.0.0:255.0.0.0 to any tcp 23 ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ No, you left out the rule number, this all is incorrect, and this tcp is redundant. It should look like: ipfw add 10000 allow tcp from 10.0.0.0/8 to any 23 Letting telnet poke through, eh? :) Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message