From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 27 04:00:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8DD16A4DD for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2AD43D4C for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:00:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so1152872nfc for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:00:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YDd6lsxEtB7xoLJ7tqouPkvfTvdhaAyN6Eo5jWXkGDNcg08Bdo/z8n3jkVhh/EgrbIExoNhU4uPJw/7kQo2JP0jZBwBgl5Q9TIVg5sE2LiHcexnhhPz9ddfg0kVKp5MfFOtfA7RIx4ORroESRE8ilHR8S5VU3FgoBXe4rLuE4lE= Received: by 10.48.220.15 with SMTP id s15mr7393600nfg; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.67.14 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:00:20 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: "Darrin Chandler" In-Reply-To: <20060827020210.GA9218@zloy.stilyagin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060826223927.I82634@hub.org> <20060827020210.GA9218@zloy.stilyagin.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: BSDstats: Just added - Vendor Stats X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:00:22 -0000 On 8/26/06, Darrin Chandler wrote: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:43:38PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > Neat to see nVidia *much* more popular then ATI though ... > > Really? Why is that neat? nVidia restricts your choices through their > staunch refusal to provide open specs. They are not nice players in this > game. At least there's some hope about ATI after the AMD deal. > Probably because the /good/ AMD boards use an nVidia chipsets. ( eg, the K8N) -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers--