From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 21 18:50:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C4DF08 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E9963902 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7LIo80T008105 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:50:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 189059] [new port] devel/diffconvert maintainer-update, master-sites Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:50:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:50:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189059 --- Comment #14 from C Hutchinson --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #13) > (In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #12) > > No. I meant redports. I have the source. > > I'm not sure I follow your "inferior" assertion. You think > > redports is inferior? > > Yes, it is based on tinderbox which is inferior to poudriere. Everyone > wants redports to be upgraded to be based on poudriere. > > > Use poudriere; you will not regret it. It's faster too. Ahh. I see. Thanks for the clarification, John. poudriere it is. I trust your advise. Anything to keep me out from under your magnifying glass. :) Thanks! --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.