Date: 16 Apr 2003 23:32:18 +0100 From: Stacey Roberts <stacey@vickiandstacey.com> To: Tuc <tuc@ttsg.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Changes in ssh? Message-ID: <1050532338.695.148.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200304162213.h3GMDtVI002954@himinbjorg.ttsg.com> References: <200304162213.h3GMDtVI002954@himinbjorg.ttsg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 23:13, Tuc wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Thanks for the reply.., > > > > On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 22:47, Tuc wrote: > > > > ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host > > > > > > > TCPWRAPPERS/hosts.allow is the first thing I think of when > > > it does this. > > > > > > > I thought of this., > > > > <snipped> > > There is the possibility that its getting caught on one of the > other things above there. The new format seems to go incrementally. Use > tcpdmatch and see if it will tell you what line causes the hit/miss: > > himinbjorg# tcpdmatch sshd valhalla > warning: sshd: no such process name in /etc/inetd.conf > warning: valhalla: hostname alias > warning: (official name: valhalla.ttsg.com) > client: hostname valhalla.ttsg.com > client: address 216.231.111.14 > server: process sshd > matched: /etc/hosts.allow line 23 > option: allow > access: granted > > (Thats the ALL:ALL:allow... taking that out :) > > himinbjorg# tcpdmatch sshd valhalla > warning: sshd: no such process name in /etc/inetd.conf > warning: valhalla: hostname alias > warning: (official name: valhalla.ttsg.com) > client: hostname valhalla.ttsg.com > client: address 216.231.111.14 > server: process sshd > matched: /etc/hosts.allow line 82 > option: severity auth.info > option: twist /bin/echo "You are not welcome to use sshd from valhalla.ttsg.com." > access: delegated > > Fails otherwise. Okay.., forgot about tcpdmatch.., Here's what I get on the new (host0) box: warning: sshd: no such process name in /etc/inetd.conf warning: <host>: hostname alias warning: (official name: <FQDN>) client: hostname <FQDN> client: address 192.168.1.7 server: process sshd matched: /etc/hosts.allow line 32 option: deny access: denied And here's what's returned from the source (host1) box: warning: sshd: no such process name in /etc/inetd.conf client: hostname <host> client: address 192.168.1.8 server: process sshd matched: /etc/hosts.allow line 30 option: deny access: denied And another host2 on the network: warning: sshd: no such process name in /etc/inetd.conf client: hostname <host> client: address 192.168.1.10 server: process sshd matched: /etc/hosts.allow line 30 option: deny access: denied Note the differences in the output from the new box and others - host1 & host2.., Is there anything in this difference? All but one box is running 4.8 Stable, the odd one out is running 4.8-RC, dated March 22, but running the same version of ssh as the others.., Regards, Stacey > > Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc. -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1050532338.695.148.camel>