From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 13:22:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3332516A4CE for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 13:22:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts5.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9B143D1D for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 13:22:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from louismunro@altern.org) Received: from localhost.invalid ([67.71.74.196]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.netESMTP <20040207212245.DFUM108.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@localhost.invalid>; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 16:22:45 -0500 From: Louis Munro To: Andy Fawcett Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 16:22:46 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <200402070827.05980.louismunro@altern.org> <40251332.2090005@sepulcrum.org> <200402071843.01208.andy@athame.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200402071843.01208.andy@athame.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200402071622.46899.louismunro@altern.org> cc: Liam Foy cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting autoconf version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 21:22:47 -0000 On February 7, 2004 11:43, Andy Fawcett wrote: > > >On February 7, 2004 11:22 am, Louis Munro wrote: > > >>I have > > >>autoconf-2.13.000227_5, autoconf-2.53_1 and autoconf-2.57_1 > > >> installed concurrently. The problem is telling my system which one > > >> to use as it defaults to 2.13.000227_5. > > > > > >Sorry, that should have read > > >The problem is telling my system which one to use as it > > >defaults to 2.53_1. > > >I don't think it fundamentally changes anything but there it is... > > >My mistake. > > > > > >Louis > > The problem here was in the kdevelop port. It should never have needed > to call autofuck in the first place, and this has now been fixed. > > As to why it cannot find the correct version of autoconf, this is > basically because the names of the autoconf binary is different from > what the KDE stuff expects. We have autoconf257, but most Linux systems > for example would have it as autoconf2.57 or maybe autoconf-2.57 > > It's a PITA, and it would be nice if we had a full set of > "compatibility" symlinks in the autotools ports. > > A. Gotcha! My local cvsup server wasn't up to date this morning, so I cvsuped from cvsup.FREEBSD.org, then did a make clean in the /x11/kde3 port and now it's back on track again. Thank you all guys, I'm a happy camper again... Louis