Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 09:16:28 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Propagating the nodump flag Message-ID: <200103011616.f21GGSd49414@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "01 Mar 2001 14:30:30 %2B0100." <xzpofvl62h5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzpofvl62h5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010301041234.9F3D63E09@bazooka.unixfreak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzpofvl62h5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: : 1) does our dump(8) have useful functionality that NetBSD's doesn't? : 2) does NetBSD's dump(8) have useful functionality that ours doesn't? : : If the answers to these questions are "no" and "yes" respectively, as : I suspect they may be, we should just replace our dump(8) with : NetBSD's. If the answers are "yes" and "yes", we should merge : evrything NetBSD's dump(8) does that ours doesn't into our dump(8) and : strive to keep the diffs between the two as small as possible. I have changes to our dump that uses wall -g rather than making it setgid. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103011616.f21GGSd49414>