Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 12:36:43 +1100 (EST) From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU (Jonathan Stone) Cc: thorpej@nas.nasa.gov, jb@cimlogic.com.au, terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org, tech-kern@netbsd.org Subject: Re: poll(2) Message-ID: <199612100136.MAA11100@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199612100109.RAA04353@Pescadero.DSG.Stanford.EDU> from Jonathan Stone at "Dec 9, 96 05:09:57 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathan Stone wrote: > Re naming, npoll() is more consistent with the sleep()/usleep() usage. > Does POSIX have anything to say here? nanopoll() is more consistent with the sleep()/nanosleep() usage which are defined in POSIX 1003.1b. usleep() is not POSIX AFAIK. -- John Birrell CIMlogic Pty Ltd jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@netbsd.org 119 Cecil Street Ph +61 3 9690 6900 South Melbourne Vic 3205 Fax +61 3 9690 6650 Australia Mob +61 18 353 137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612100136.MAA11100>