From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 16:05:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49D416A4D2 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:05:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yearning.mcc.ac.uk (yearning.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.203.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BD243D41 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:05:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by yearning.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CUomq-0002cg-RG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:05:32 +0000 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) iAIG5VlZ043841 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:05:32 GMT (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) id iAIG5VOG043840 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:05:31 GMT Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:05:31 +0000 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041118160531.GA43779@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: BSD equivalents of autoconf, automake, etc. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:05:34 -0000 I'm starting to dabble in these self-contained self-building scripts and tools and so on, like automake, autoconf, libtool, and so on. Are these the preferred way of doing things on FreeBSD, or is there a better or more BSD-way of doing them? Some time ago, Terry Lambert suggested that tools such as imake were vastly superior, and that the GNU tools were just to compensate for the inconsistencies across Linux distros. I'd like to learn something that makes sense to learn because it is practical, but at the same time, without sacrificing too much portability. jm --