Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:15:10 -0500 (CDT) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@geekpunk.net> To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raidframe Message-ID: <20020529131425.L38319-100000@leto.homeportal.2wire.net> In-Reply-To: <20020529182413.D53116@energyhq.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Miguel Mendez wrote: >The latest raidframe patch seems to be a bit date now, I'd like to know >if any of you has worked on getting it cleanly applying to a recent >4.5-STABLE (4.6-RC indeed) system of even 5.0-CURRENT tree. I'd like to >play with it and would like to know if someone has taken care of it >before devoting time to making this patch work against a recent >-CURRENT. Is there a reason you can't use vinum(4)? Brandon D. Valentine -- http://www.geekpunk.net bandix@geekpunk.net ++[>++++++<-]>[<++++++>-]<.>++++[>+++++<-]>[<+++++>-]<+.+++++++..++ +.>>+++++[<++++++>-]<++.<<+++++++++++++++.>.+++.------.--------.>+. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020529131425.L38319-100000>