From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue May 13 18:48:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA02925 for alpha-outgoing; Tue, 13 May 1997 18:48:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA02914 for ; Tue, 13 May 1997 18:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA11375 for ; Tue, 13 May 1997 18:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Prev-Resent: Tue, 13 May 1997 18:48:50 -0700 Prev-Resent: "freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org " Received: from mail13.digital.com (mail13.digital.com [192.208.46.30]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA04890 for ; Mon, 12 May 1997 12:01:30 -0700 (PDT) From: clemc@polaris.mro.dec.com Received: from polaris.mro.dec.com by mail13.digital.com (8.7.5/UNX 1.5/1.0/WV) id OAA16505; Mon, 12 May 1997 14:42:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost by polaris.mro.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/14Aug96-1201PM) id AA27795; Mon, 12 May 1997 14:40:44 -0400 Message-Id: <9705121840.AA27795@polaris.mro.dec.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: rose@pa.dec.com, dhunter@pa.dec.com Subject: SRM vs ARC vs ``Alpha BIOS'' Really-From: Clement T. Cole Organization: Technical Director, SPE; Digital Equipment Corp; 508-467-3614 X-Face: 3}V1_dLw'G]SyK"z1**jB);1uPOBSQWhKMARA<6*R$* Reply-To: clemc@mro.dec.com Date: Mon, 12 May 97 14:40:43 -0400 X-Mts: smtp Resent-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 18:48:50 -0700 Resent-Message-ID: <11371.863574530@time.cdrom.com> Resent-From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jordan, It turns out that Alpha's have some slick Intel BIOS emulation called the ``Alpa BIOS.'' This is used by both ARC and SRM to set up add-in cards. I had a long chat with Dave Hunter today, and Dave is going to talk to him friends in NT-Land that know the most about this. The more he and I talked, the more it sounds like this the technology that you need to be looking at for raw boot. My guess is that you will be able to use it get to the traditional FreeBSD bootstrap code, similar to the way you do now with the modified CMU Mach/Oliveti-Intel boot loader [which calls in the ROM-BIOS]. You are still likely to need help with the PAL code. You will need to support some of it, the question is how much and what. Clem