From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jan 2 0:50: 4 2001 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 2 00:50:02 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CD737B400 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 00:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f028o2i14054; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 00:50:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 00:50:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200101020850.f028o2i14054@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: ports/23978: NEW PORT: security/amavis-perl Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: gnats@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/23978; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Will Andrews , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Bill Fumerola , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ports/23978: NEW PORT: security/amavis-perl Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 03:44:45 -0500 On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 10:19:33AM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > It's perhaps possible to build amavis, but, the whole point in my port was > an automatic install, the goal I achieved in my port (for sendmail only > this time). > Supporting other MTAs demands much more work, which is why I'm not sure it > will be supported soon. > Also, postfix-current is needed for postfix support, and this demands > dedicating some thought about this issue. Ok, but this doesn't really have anything to do with the difference between my suggestion and Bill's. The difference is, if the MTA options are mutually exclusive, you must use Bill's suggestion. If they are not, you can use Bill's but mine would be more flexible. > Looking forward to see it committed. Waiting on security/uvscan-dat update. Kris? Just update the MD5 and bump the version please. :-) -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message