From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Oct 31 22:31:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from not.demophon.com (ns.demophon.com [193.65.70.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6915314A25 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 22:31:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@not.demophon.com) Received: (from will@localhost) by not.demophon.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) id IAA00394; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 08:30:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from will) To: don@calis.blacksun.org (Don) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: journaling UFS and LFS References: From: Ville-Pertti Keinonen Date: 01 Nov 1999 08:29:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: don@calis.blacksun.org's message of "30 Oct 1999 19:18:08 +0300" Message-ID: <86hfj63es8.fsf@not.demophon.com> Lines: 21 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG don@calis.blacksun.org (Don) writes: > > and the next question: now that LFS starts to get usable in NetBSD > > - has anybody started to look at getting it working again in > > FreeBSD too (maybe matt ?) or has it on the TODO list > LFS is being considered as a starting point for this project. The goal is > to build an extensible file system with features such as the ability to > grow and shrink partitions, acl's journaling etc. There is a difference between a log-structured filesystem and a journaling filesystem... > XFS is also being considered as a feature reference. *Very* different from LFS. (What are features? "Has files and directories"? Time-complexity? Implementation details? Buzzwords?) This seems a bit hard to believe (must check freebsd-fs to see if people are actually *seriously* considering LFS as a starting point...). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message