Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:01:05 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
To:        Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS obn FreeBSD hardware model for 48 or 96 sata3 paths...
Message-ID:  <alpine.GSO.2.01.1109201055160.26410@freddy.simplesystems.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ5YG5raCwvE-kZQ9wjzYvxqCRBPFy47FWOsN1Yjoga1Bw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <alpine.GSO.2.01.1109171451500.1973@freddy.simplesystems.org> <1316459220.35419.YahooMailClassic@web121209.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <CAOjFWZ6Y4PbAaZzMxyzZHmtrNBJzOK8GMVJL0GP0PMdwj9SeXg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.2.01.1109191613520.7097@freddy.simplesystems.org> <CAOjFWZ5YG5raCwvE-kZQ9wjzYvxqCRBPFy47FWOsN1Yjoga1Bw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

---559023410-351212254-1316534465=:26410
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Freddie Cash wrote:
> 
> L2ARC has extreme bandwidth limitations as compared with RAM.  Be careful what you wish for.
> 
> For writes (7 MBps, I believe); there shouldn't be any limits on the reads. 

If (for example) an SSD is used with a 200MB/s read rate for the 
L2ARC, then the L2ARC is limited to 200MB/s (as compared with perhaps 
10GB/s or 20GB/s for RAM).

The L2ARC is really all about eliminating the access latency of 
rotating-rust but any device will provide far less bandwidth than 
system RAM.

Bob
-- 
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
---559023410-351212254-1316534465=:26410--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.2.01.1109201055160.26410>