Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:40:13 +0100 From: Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of lukemftpd? (was: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf (fwd)) Message-ID: <20021105204013.GC56253@gits.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021027002550.73222J-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <20021027021440.GB58312@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021027002550.73222J-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 12:33:41AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > (1) All references to lukemftpd as "the ftpd" be corrected to indicate > > > lukemftpd is not the default. Most of these are leaked references > > > from lukemftpd man pages that were not updated in the import. > > > > We typically don't rewrite contrib'ed vendor branch code. On some of my > > systems lukemftp is THE ftpd, so they do apply. > > Just to make it completely clear what I'm talking about here: we do have a > "the ftpd", because we install it as /usr/libexec/ftpd. Lukemftpd is > installed as /usr/libexec/lukemftpd. Documentation should refer to the > binaries and man pages correctly. One specific example of this is > ftpd.conf(5), which incorrectly stats: how about the following PR ? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/39676 Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021105204013.GC56253>