From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 11 16:29:56 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A7A6837B401; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C81CB43F75; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com)
Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h3BNTsBg013765;
	Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (eischen@localhost)h3BNTs2X013762;
	Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304111302390.19238-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304111921400.12814-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: davidxu@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: New libpthread patch available.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:29:57 -0000

On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:

> David,
> 
> I fixed a couple of bugs and put another patch set up at the usual place:
> 
>   http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/libpthread.diffs
> 
> This seems to pass all but 10 or so of the 110 ACE tests.  I'll do some
> more testing with this and libc_r and post those results later.

Here's the rundown of the tests that don't pass:

                              libkse       libc_r
  ACE 5.3.1 Test               Pass?        Pass?
  ------------------------------------------------
  Cached_Conn_Test             No           No
  Conn_Test                    No           Yes
  MT_Reactor_Timer_Test        No           Yes
  Malloc_Test                  No           No
  Proactor_Test                No           No
  Proactor_Timer_Test          No           No
  Process_Manager_Test         No           Yes
  Process_Strategy_Test        No           Yes
  Sigset_Ops_Test              No           No
  Thread_Pool_Test             No           Yes

So we're only 5 short of catching up to where libc_r is.
Once signals get fixed, that my solve some of the remaining
problems (Jeff, Julian???).

The full results of the 110 ACE tests is at:

  http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/kse/ACE_test_results.txt

-- 
Dan Eischen