From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 13:41:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17AA106566B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from satishkamara@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA8D8FC0A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com with SMTP id v3so1226133lag.13 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:41:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gVXAiUWOVIFcPAI/1pIxsj1azFnm7/omkAoXoNJW6bE=; b=hKgGfb/SX8k72JWRMoWSVw5WsjjGgOgM2B8GPWIJ6APBZ3aN4j3q4iamCWOcN9gR25 X3gXDdH96FeFLYgpVpb3rQyRNTA3lxCUCgjFu9lW6V5oe/phO8CZPoMWZ7O1JlJQ4EP+ eGmypyHNvPwjJ5wtZeTq4yr6hp3dpnwBwwaTHw5ca4wUz83Lkph5u/PzB4UNbm5P40/A 2B1pp9KhPuYHgMT/BsSDSZS9deNbLkcurJ96tXklQhrkyUJlBWafaWg7nXGAZ5EMAhVh NCTepXWsHYCGgjauRevhgr7IHMrY1JFUPO8ZOwY8TwT1TspSpVf6GUFMNquwwtjPQJEp 2UTg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.145.169 with SMTP id sv9mr1461000lab.12.1335447193409; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.128.197 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:33:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120425042052.GA29615@DataIX.net> References: <20120425042052.GA29615@DataIX.net> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:33:13 -0400 Message-ID: From: satish amara To: Jason Hellenthal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LLA (Link local address) in FreeBSD route command X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:41:04 -0000 I gave reference to old man page because it talks about scope which is related to link local address of IPV6. I don't see the latest man page talks about link-local address of IPV6. So I am looking for how routes for link-local address are handled in latest BSD Stack. I see some configurations where people are giving link-local address as gateway. So I am trying to see whether these configuration are valid and if not there could be bug. If BSD allows to configure routes for link local address of IPV6 then I think it could be bug as they are local to subnet and typically there routes are automatic. I am not sure allowing link-local address as gateway address is valid or not for IPV6. Thanks, Satish K Amara On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > First off lets start by referencing something that is correct and > staying within-band instead of OOB. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=route > > Review that page and if you still have any questions then please ask > again. > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:07:54PM -0400, satish amara wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to see what is valid and is supported in latest > > FreeBSD > > > > Does BSD let user add routes to LLA destinations? > > > > Does BSD let user specify LLA gateway without specifying the scope? > > > > > > I see following man page which talks about scope but looks like it not > > supported in the latest. > > > > http://www.manpagez.com/man/8/route/ > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Satish K Amara > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > > - (2^(N-1)) >