From owner-cvs-ports  Tue Aug  6 16:56:03 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA16245
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 16:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu (root@sunrise.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.121])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA16128;
          Tue, 6 Aug 1996 16:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu (8.7.5/8.6.12) id QAA02746; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 16:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 16:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199608062353.QAA02746@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: erich@lodgenet.com
CC: erich@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199608041755.MAA00316@jake.lodgenet.com> (erich@lodgenet.com)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/xephem - Imported sources
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * maybe,  I dropped it in right next to xphoon and xearth.  It wouldn't
 * take much to convince me to move it though.

Yeah, xphoon and xearth are sort of borderline cases, I put them in
x11 because they aren't much more than xsetroot and there isn't a
better category.  A full-blown astronomy program shouldn't go to x11.

 * would that just be a repository move? (plus Makefiles of course)

Yes.  Peter will do it if he's not too busy -- otherwise, I can
re-import it, as it's still very new and we don't have much history to 
lose.

Satoshi