Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 07:30:54 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: port building make config dialog dependencies idea Message-ID: <CAN6yY1vz0Bo_WL8pPdDYah=H0XX6NZMk_gMjb4A6LxHdL_90YA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1505652040247-0.post@n6.nabble.com> References: <1505478215829-0.post@n6.nabble.com> <CAN6yY1tE2Y4fayWT-taURAv525rZ_2m%2BqDLTa9sgWjZukdTSrw@mail.gmail.com> <1505652040247-0.post@n6.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> wrote: > FWIW, I've filled a PR relating to the original idea. > > > If I have a config for such a port and that option moves > > becomes a default, I never see it unless I look. > > I think you are presented with a dialog each time the defaults > changes. Speaking of which, the defaults could/should be marked > as well. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-ports- > f3835061.html > New options are tagged '+' in diaog4ports, but default option changed are not. Just flagging defaults would pretty much resolve the issue and would be trivial to implement. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1vz0Bo_WL8pPdDYah=H0XX6NZMk_gMjb4A6LxHdL_90YA>