From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Sep 30 17:34:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from relay1.inwind.it (relay1.inwind.it [212.141.53.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE6537B502 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 17:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bartequi.ottodomain.org (62.98.153.64) by relay1.inwind.it (5.1.046) id 39AFDC990046CAB6; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 02:33:19 +0200 From: Salvo Bartolotta Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 01:34:03 GMT Message-ID: <20001001.1340300@bartequi.ottodomain.org> Subject: Re: install from 4.1 CDROM failed To: john253@crosswinds.net Cc: media@ct1.nai.net, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: SuperCalifragilis X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 10/1/00, 1:06:11 AM, John Murphy wrote=20 regarding Re: install from 4.1 CDROM failed: > >I tried it again. It failed. I got the same message. > > > >The 4.1 installer seems a bit different from the 3.4. Where did the = bad > >block scan go?? The flag is described on the help page (F1), but the= > >command is not listed. > I don't remember seeing or needing that. Perhaps these bad blocks are= =20 the > problem. /usr/src/UPDATING states:
19991203: BAD144 support has been removed. Cope or replace the hardware.
C'est la vie.=20 BTW, "Bad block on an IDE drive" is yet another relevant -questions=20 thread to look for in the archives :-) Best regards, Salvo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message