From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 16:34:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B95916A4D1 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:34:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C636143D3F for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:34:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bdaniel7@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 1so305096rny for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:34:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=fe6HquvUkPD4VXp6Z89NnkjnbMGSKjpW1rQaBi/wkqgeZTKDhtqkgehm1mEi+pnXHUlgRnHtutpqampanIQBJwMiOFlztJANIs55fFgAMNRYQhuA8StAGlw+1dOkEWAsx/3BgAzGbld+aMQNBA/alQYGgB+cNr6BD1VGhuZsaOo= Received: by 10.38.206.31 with SMTP id d31mr156828rng; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:34:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.8.19 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:34:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <89b41e470502240834ba670b1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:34:34 +0200 From: Daniel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <89b41e4705022407542f4feaa9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <89b41e4705022407542f4feaa9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:34:42 -0000 sorry, i should have sent this to entire list... On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:43:32 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote among others... > > FreeBSD does not have some of the things - such as distributed management > of hundreds to thousands of FreeBSD servers over a large enterprise - > that > are a requirement for big companies. would not these things be worthy of implementing in FreeBSD? this way other big companies would use it, pay you guys for it and FreeBSD will grow stronger... making a good OS that runs on cheap, low-end machines is nice, but the real money come from companies... another idea, a study of what features big companies want from an OS should be conducted...by you, maybe or some other people interested and these features be prioritized for FreeBSD... have a good day.. Dan