From owner-freebsd-scsi Wed Dec 15 15:22:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D260A153F3 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 15:22:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id AAA07146 for freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:22:39 +0100 (CET) Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.9.3/8.9.1) id AAA92225; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:11:41 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from j) Message-ID: <19991216001140.64432@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:11:40 +0100 From: J Wunsch To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: filemarks? Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch References: <19991215100956.30691@uriah.heep.sax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: ; from Matthew Jacob on Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 08:07:27AM -0800 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org As Matthew Jacob wrote: > Yet another reason why 1FM@EOT should be the default. Yep > Unfortunately, we have too many ill-informed or fanciful or contrary > users to allow this (I tried to get this as a default for 4.0). That's like Poul-Hennings bike shed problem... It's probably better to make no noise about it and just change it in a ``mumble, mumble, improve the sa(4) driver a little'' commit than asking publically before. ;-) I bet nobody would even notice the change if it happened... (In particular, i think the driver could simulate 2 FM's once it noticed the EOM signal from the drive.) > It seems to me that rather than proliferating compiled in quirks, we > should work on the magical table that can be parsed at boot time. I'm in favour of any hac^H^H^Hsolution that works. :) > Yes- you should check the latest driver out, Joerg. *blush* I've built a release yesterday, but the /usr/src of my machine's already about 2 months old now, right... It probably won't be updated before year 2000 since i'm going to leave for Russia next week, visiting my girlfriend there. > It does a test read at mount time. And I have people yelling it me > because of the time it takes. They simply didn't understand that this time will always be taken, either at the time the first mt(1) command is issued, or by the time of the first actual read/write operation... > Can't please anyone.... a driver writer's lot is so hard Ah well, you're robust enough to bear it. ;-) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message