From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Dec 20 10:37:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA03165 for smp-outgoing; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:37:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA03159 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:37:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA14565; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:37:09 -0800 (PST) To: info@sltic.com cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cpu monitor In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:00:29 CST." <3.0.1.32.19971220100029.04e194d0@sltic.com> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:37:09 -0800 Message-ID: <14562.882643029@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I see one listed at 50%, the other at %48. What I'd like is each CPU > represented individually. Something like: > CPU0 %user %nice %system ...... etc. > CPU1 %user %nice %system ...... Send us your diffs. That's how things like this happen. :-) Jordan