Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:51:18 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net> To: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com> Cc: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org>, Nikolas Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: interesting past 4 hours... Message-ID: <20051015105118.2d26f335@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420510150106w5b0641ddra2ce30127d64942a@mail.gmail.com> References: <20051012213632.GA3888@thought.org> <ef10de9a0510141908g7a7467f9l763d512ea329e7de@mail.gmail.com> <20051015075710.GB26129@thought.org> <cb5206420510150106w5b0641ddra2ce30127d64942a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:06:30 +0400 "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com> wrote: > Many FreeBSD users came to love Fluxbox. It's > a windowmaker-based manager, very nice, very > lightweight. It's not an environment, so there are > no file managers, viewers, keyrings, etc. included. > But it has some support for both KDE and Gnome > programs, so you can easily install any Gnome- > based tool (it'll also install some parts of Gnome, > but not all of it). It has no conflicts with Gnome/ > KDE, so you can install and see if you like it. Actually Fluxbox is blackbox based.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051015105118.2d26f335>