From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 14:23:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16A137B401; Sat, 10 May 2003 14:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from noisebox.cypherpunks.to (adsl-208-201-229-163.sonic.net [208.201.229.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC96943F3F; Sat, 10 May 2003 14:23:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shamrock@cypherpunks.to) Received: from VAIO650 (adsl-208-201-229-160.sonic.net [208.201.229.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by noisebox.cypherpunks.to (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C55013D; Sat, 10 May 2003 14:23:30 -0700 (PDT) From: "Lucky Green" To: "'Doug Barton'" Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 14:23:21 -0700 Message-ID: <001701c3173a$628d3830$6a01a8c0@VAIO650> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <20030510141125.Q5056@znfgre.qbhto.arg> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Port startup scripts under rcNG? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 21:23:32 -0000 Doug wrote: > On Sat, 10 May 2003, Lucky Green wrote: > > > What is the correct place in the FreeBSD file system for a Port > > startup script that executes a program as a specific user > under rcNG? > > I'm sorry, I don't truly understand your question. Is there > some specific feature of rcNG that you want to use in your > script, or do you just want to make sure it will still run > under rcNG? If the latter, you're covered, since ports > startup scripts are still executed from /usr/local/etc/rc.d > just like they always were. You covered the answer. I was wondering if the sentence "old-style scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/" in man rc should be taken as an indication that this location is being depreciated for all start-up scripts, including Ports. Thanks, --Lucky