Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Jan 2001 09:43:06 +0300 (MSK)
From:      "Aleksandr A.Babaylov" <babolo@links.ru>
To:        clash@fireduck.com (Joe Gleason)
Cc:        warendaj@home.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Not so much a question ...
Message-ID:  <200101080643.JAA04170@aaz.links.ru>
In-Reply-To: <000d01c07933$8dd95f20$0c2d2d0a@fireduck.com> from "Joe Gleason" at "Jan 8, 1 00:26:28 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joe Gleason writes:
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> This should probably be in ports as well....
> 
> This brings up several questions:
> 
> 1) Do any ports have dependencies that they don't really need?  If so, is
> there a plan to work on this?
> 
> 2) Should there be a function to list dependencies and recursive
> dependencies of a port?  Is there one already?  That way a person could see
> what was involved before deciding to install a port.  Something like 'make
> showdepends' would be really cool.
ports/sysutils/pib

> I could probably make a shell script that does 2, but I dont know who I
> would give it to.
> 
> 
> In answer to your question of how to gracefully abort a 'make install',
> generally Ctrl+C and then 'make clean'.  While make clean wont delete any
> dependencies already installed, it will clean up working files in them all.
> 
> Joe Gleason
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John" <warendaj@home.com>
> To: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 12:05 AM
> Subject: Not so much a question ...
> 
> 
> >     ... as a concern.
> >
> >     I'm a huge fan of the ports collection, one of the things that first
> > turned me on to FreeBSD.  It's a miracle convenience, but after three plus
> > years running FreeBSD on various systems, I've been shocked tonight to have
> > a complaint about it.
> >     Tinkering with a spare system, I had just gotten X running and wanted to
> > make it a little more pleasing than plain old twm.  I figured what the heck,
> > I'll check out Windowmaker.  That port went swimingly.
> >
> >     Before I left the X11-wm ports dir, a "wmakerconfig" dir caught my eye.
> > I decided to take a peek at the pkg-descr.  It sounded like it might be a
> > handy little thing as I'd no experience with Windowmaker.  I went ahead and
> > did the 'make install' and walked out of the room to get a soda.
> >     I was rather shocked that it was still going by the time I came back.
> > Hm, why's that I thought.  Much to my shock over 50 megs of dependancies and
> > dependancies on dependancies on dependancies on ... you get the idea ...
> > were being installed.  I decided to let it go because it was half way
> > through installing GTK which I figured wouldn't be bad to have installed
> > anyway because I'd probably need it for more significant things if I decided
> > to play with X more.
> >     More to my horror this wasn't the least of it.  Then it needed to
> > install everything from automake to *RedHat Package Manager* ... to Lord
> > only knows what else.  Needless to say if I knew I was going to be getting
> > 80 megs of stuff I'll probably never have need for again, I'd probably have
> > avoided the install all together (it's still going, I may not even have a
> > use for this program).
...... so on

-- 
@BABOLO      http://links.ru/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101080643.JAA04170>