Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:30:42 +0200
From:      Nevermind <never@nevermind.kiev.ua>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@acm.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING
Message-ID:  <20020118163042.GB35506@nevermind.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20020118182325.B60750@sunbay.com>
References:  <20020118151109.GA35506@nevermind.kiev.ua> <200201181557.g0IFvbi44263@bmah.dyndns.org> <20020118182325.B60750@sunbay.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Ruslan Ermilov!

On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 06:23:25PM +0200, you wrote:

> > > I suppose we should note that using in kernel "maxusers 0" 
> > > is now default and recomended setting now.
> > 
> > UPDATING is for issues that could potentially cause a system to break 
> > during an upgrade.  This isn't one of them.
> > 
> I agree.  Let's not make UPDATING another relnotes copy.  :-)
Hm, I agree, please, forgive my clueless :)
I posted this because a friend of mine asked me abous maxusers 0 in
GENERIC and he was a little bit confused with this.

Thank you.

-- 
NEVE-RIPE

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020118163042.GB35506>