From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 22 23:52:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9A116A9D4; Mon, 22 May 2006 23:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from mail07.powweb.com (mail07.powweb.com [66.152.97.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606BD43D62; Mon, 22 May 2006 23:52:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (24-119-225-24.cpe.cableone.net [24.119.225.24]) by mail07.powweb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA8914DFD9; Mon, 22 May 2006 16:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 18:53:13 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: pav@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20060522185313.289edabb@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <1148325485.92062.11.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <20060521234850.2fd4d360@mwilke.ath.cx> <20060521200933.7d600cd4@vixen42.vulpes> <1148325485.92062.11.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Martin Wilke Subject: Re: new categorie "meta" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 23:52:50 -0000 On Mon, 22 May 2006 21:18:05 +0200 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Vulpes Velox p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v ne 21. 05. 2006 v 20:09 -0500: > > On Sun, 21 May 2006 23:48:50 +0200 > > Martin Wilke wrote: > >=20 > > > Hi Friends, > > >=20 > > > since creating new categories comes in vogue lately I just > > > wanted to ask what you think about creating a categorie called > > > "META". Why you should do that is simple: There are enough > > > ports serving as meta ports. These include: > > >=20 > > > lang/php4-extensions > > > lang/php5-extensions > > > x11/xorg > > > x11/gnome2 > > > x11/gnome2-lite > > > x11/kde3 > > > x11/kde-lite > > > x11-wm/xfce4 > > >=20 > > > usw. > > >=20 > > > That would lead to a clearer layout and improved overview of > > > large applications (esp for newbies). > >=20 > > I agree with the rest that it is a bad idea. I do think the > > though of tagging everything that is a meta port with meta- > > though. Like with linux binary ports are done. The only one that > > makes me consider this being a bad idea is x11/xorg, but not > > quite sure why immediately. >=20 > pkg_add -r meta-gnome2 > pkg_add -r meta-kde3 > pkg_add -r meta-xfce4 >=20 > Do you think this is intuitive? :) Would a answer of yes surprise you? ^_^