From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 21 03:30:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819161065672; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7938FC17; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1387040eyd.9 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:30:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ObenStSF+BVrtozyHu8ELQIrUPZk0qkqx8wlLrvA7+Q=; b=o84+nGuYwNa3WF1k76vqvWXgb7XbsUT5domA5qkLj3Zmqo6c9OGcVIzj0+rzrppVQT MtAmqYcahdUN9p/RjKpxDX23W/8B2YPI9njLogTddqqngJVLow27AcriO+grjFyzAGjB 0SBEpVidE4hAQvastHMHiTB5eN3ScDKOSghqc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XTq9RM2rAkBXAmB9o4AOL3267HxYu1eFGtx1Y48l8YxqT8sqJco7njPyDwBWDtdYmZ /Gj0MMLVNx+rGOmS3rLhum1IIvufvXUFDwSBl7kOBxBgPZ8PLlrmrHL+lX5rRB+e1HxZ ZNB8IS1fgpU/3+VRbibhURwDBtLhSLlBFhlxw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.156.19 with SMTP id i19mr2229686ebo.79.1256095818737; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:30:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:30:18 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ryan Stone To: "b. f." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: qingli@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r198306 - head/sys/net X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:30:20 -0000 Judging from the checkin comment, it is not intended to only eliminate the call to sched_bind in the non-SMP case. However. you asked whether it would work correctly in the non-SMP case and I answered that question. Ryan