From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 30 14:37:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B741016A4CE for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:37:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moby.liwing.de (www.liwing.de [82.97.68.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F4543D39 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:37:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rehsack@liwing.de) Received: from [80.64.176.27] (helo=[10.62.10.4]) by moby.helpers.liwing.de with esmtp (Exim 4.40 (FreeBSD)) id 1CNuMB-0000B5-6Y; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:37:27 +0000 Message-ID: <4183A771.7080906@liwing.de> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:38:41 +0000 From: Jens Rehsack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040722 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <27404.1099146185@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <27404.1099146185@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: Filesystem rototiling over X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:37:19 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <4183A23D.4020201@liwing.de>, Jens Rehsack writes: > >>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >>>In message <20041029144801.GA36784@over-yonder.net>, "Matthew D. Fuller" writes >>>: >>> >>> >>>>On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 02:20:08PM +0200 I heard the voice of >>>>Poul-Henning Kamp, and lo! it spake thus: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Jail-users please notice that you can now mount the same partition >>>>>many places, as long as you do it read/only: >>>> >>>>To clarify: This means it can be mounted R/O a bunch of times, but not >>>>that it can be mounted R/W once and R/O a bunch of times, right? >>> >>> >>>Correct. >>> >> >>Oh, that means for each update you have to stop all jails running >>on those mounts? How useful could that be on production machines? > > > I don't know, that depends on what you use jails for. Web-Service(s), Mail-Service(s), Name-Service, ... And on each update I had to stop the services, shutting down the jail, unmount each ro-bunch, mount rw, update, unmount, remount ro-bunches, starting jails & services. Jens